|
GREAT BATTLES OF THE ANCIENT MACEDONIANS The oldest evidence of Macedonian written tradition which deal with the wars between the Zets of different Zetas dates back to the Neolithic period. Perhaps one of the most characteristic written documents of the Macedonian prehistoric chroniclers is the text from Osinchani, near Skopje, which is engraved in a stone in the shape of a long fish. It possesses exceptional semantics and unbelievably compatible and logical compositional arrangement of language and graphic material, and its educative content is as follows:
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
(A battle between
zetas is described, expressing their meanness.)
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
There is numerous
evidence of the oldest written tradition in the world - the Macedonian.
However, they remain unknown to the greater part of modern historiography.
For this reason the luxurious encyclopaedias and richly illustrated monographic
publications do not contain the oldest evidence of the wars and the actors
in this oldest theatre of mankind. Between BC 2100 and BC 1200 the zet,
IGLAL boasted that he destroyed the ancient Macedonian empire of
Ege.
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
|
Most probably due to the fact that these and other similar Macedonian monuments to literacy were not published, they allow room for the modern historians and military analysts to claim that the first armoured clash on land between great powers, which determined the fate of the war, was noted around BC 1478 near Megida. It was also said to be the first battle ever that history knows of, the oldest in the era of slaveholding society. According to them, its outcome, as well as the victory of Ramses II near Kadeshite in approximately BC 1295, brought Egypt control over present-day Syria and Palestine. In relation to their consequences, the other battles of the Ancient East are also similar. All available forces are gathered and in the short term clashes the fate of the state is decided even of those such as Babylon in BC 539, near Opis, of Egypt in BC 525 near Pelusi, of Lydia near Pterii, Tembra etc.
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Almost
every battle at the time was organised and was usually won by the side
that was greater in number, which was better trained, and with a stronger
morale. The main role was played by the archers and spear-throwers, and
later the cavalry and two-wheel carts, who had the task of breaking the
battle line of the opponent. |
|||||
|
Fresco from the so-called
Tomb of Kig (near the town Negus, Aegean Macedonia), which
shows the |
|||||
|
As early
as the Trojan War (BC 1193-1183) considered to be the first world war
between ancient Macedonian tribes and followers of the newly come Danais,
with the ancient Macedonians these battles on land represent clashes between
broken up masses of heavy infantry armoured for close battle; light infantry
with weapons for throwing and the cavalry were of secondary importance.
|
|||||
|
Potrait of Philip II Macedonian made of ivory and found in the tomb of the Macedonian czar in the so-called Golemata Tumba near the ancientmacedonian capital Ege (IV century B.C.). Thessaloniky, Archeological Museum |
Map with the disposition
of the military formations of the Macedonians led by the Macedonian
czar Philip II Macedonian against the combined forces |
||||
|
On this occasion
we must emphasize that in the battle on the Granik River, according to
Arian, on the Persian side there were 20,000 cavalry and 20,000 Hellenic
mercenaries-infantry from Minor and Great Frigia, Lydia, and Kapadokia.
According to Arian, the Persians lost 1,000 cavalry and 18,000 infantry,
while the Macedonians only lost 85 cavalry and 30 infantrymen. According
to Plutarch, the Persians lost 20,000 infantrymen and 2,500 cavalrymen,
while the Macedonians lost only 34, of whom 9 were infantrymen. |
|||||
|
|||||
|
Respecting his great, clever, fast, and brave rival, the captive and heavily wounded Por asked that he be treated like a king, which meant that he be killed. However, the generous and human Alexander III of Macedon treated the Indian king truly like a king: he restored his royal dignity, he returned his previous governing, and even granted him additional land in which, according to Plutarch, there were fifteen tribes, five thousand larger cities and many villages and thus made him a loyal vassal ruler of part of the Great Macedonian Empire, which at the time spanned over a territory of 3.8 million square kilometers. Of course, Pors ruling was constantly controlled by a Macedonian deputy in Punjab. It seems that after the foundation of the city of Bukefalia, and an entire 9 years after the battle near the Hidasp River, in BC 317 King Por was killed by the Macedonian deputy Evdem. At least this is what sources and military historians say, analysing the huge, inestimable Macedonian contribution to the development of works on war in the world, who opened the doors for spreading of the great Macedonian culture towards the East and throughout the civilized world giving this great Macedonian civilization tremendous opportunities for permanent growth and development with new impulses. |
|||||